Limits of endoscopic endonasal transpterygoid approach to cavernous sinus and Meckel's cave

30Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) to the ventral skull base has greatly increased in popularity over the last two decades. So-called expanded EEA have opened corridors to pathology off-midline, including lesions within the cavernous sinus and Meckel's cave. A standard EEA exposure into the sphenoid sinus allows visualization of the medial cavernous sinus; a transpterygoid approach allows for surgical manipulation of the lateral cavernous sinus and Meckel's cave contents. Pituitary adenomas, meningiomas, and schwannomas are the most common pathologies in this region. This approach to the "front door" of the cavernous sinus and Meckel's cave should be considered complementary to traditional craniotomy techniques as each have benefits and limitations. Herein we review the published literature regarding endoscopic endonasal transpterygoid surgery for pathology in the lateral cavernous sinus and Meckel's cave, and the anatomical and functional limitations of these approaches.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hardesty, D. A., Montaser, A. S., Carrau, R. L., & Prevedello, D. M. (2018, June 1). Limits of endoscopic endonasal transpterygoid approach to cavernous sinus and Meckel’s cave. Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences. Edizioni Minerva Medica. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0390-5616.18.04330-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free