Natural history of lumbar canal stenosis: Clinical aspects and sagittal balance

0Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the sagittal alignment (SA) parameters in individuals with LCS and surgical indication with a control group and to study the correlations between SA parameters and ODI, VAS and EQ-5D in individuals with LCS and surgical indication. Methods: In this multicenter cross-sectional case-control study, the individuals were allocated as follows. A stenosis group (SG) composed by patients with LCS confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging with surgical indication, treated between July 2010 and August 2016 and a control group (CG), without LCS. All subjects underwent anamnesis, completed the Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and total spine radiographs were taken. Clinical data, HRQoL and radiographic parameters were correlated. Results: Sixty-four individuals formed the SG and 14 the CG. The SG had higher values of mean age, coronal imbalance, sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic tilt (PT), sacrofemoral distance (SFD), overhang (OH), PI-LL mismatch, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain and smaller thoracic kyphosis (TK), total (TLPL) and regional lumbopelvic lordosis (RLPL) in all vertebrae, sagittal offset (SO) in all evaluated vertebrae and EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) with p <0.05. In the SG, the only significant correlations (p <0.05) were between TK and ODI and EQ-5D; all the other sagittal parameters did not correlated with VAS, ODI or EQ-5D. Conclusion: SG had SA parameters altered in relation to CG. There was a direct correlation between decrease in TK and worsening of ODI and EQ-5D in SG. Level of evidence: III; Case Control Study.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

De Paiva, V. C., Neto, M. I. R., Zuiani, G. R., Veiga, I. G., Pasqualini, W., Tebet, M. A., … Cliquet, A. (2019). Natural history of lumbar canal stenosis: Clinical aspects and sagittal balance. Coluna/ Columna, 18(3), 209–213. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1808-185120191803179255

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free