Decision-making for the hazard ranking of water distribution networks using the TOPSIS method

2Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Owing to the consecutive occurrence of water quality incidents, such as the black and red water situation in Incheon, Mullae (Seoul), and Pohang, as well as the tap water larval events in Incheon and Jeju in 2020, South Korea’s Ministry of Environment announced the new addition of Article 12-2 of the Enforcement Decree of the Water Supply and Waterworks Installation Act 2021. Additionally, the importance of intensive management for vulnerable areas where water quality incidents and complaints may occur repeatedly was specified. Therefore, this study suggests the hazard ranking of district-metered areas in the study area using the deterioration of the water distribution network, complaints (water quality, leakage), and modeling results (water pressure, residual chlorine concentration) to support the establishment of a reasonable water distribution network maintenance plan. The effective and sustainable maintenance of the water distribution network is possible if the hazard ranking is regularly determined using the suggested methodology proposed herein and the water distribution network intensive management area is managed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Park, H. K., Kim, K. B., Hyung, J. S., Kim, T. H., & Koo, J. Y. (2023). Decision-making for the hazard ranking of water distribution networks using the TOPSIS method. Water Supply, 23(2), 715–726. https://doi.org/10.2166/WS.2023.013

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free