Corrigendum: Urinary luteinizing hormone tests: Which concentration threshold best predicts ovulation? [Front. Public Health, 5, (2017) (320)] doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00320

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In the original article, there was a mistake in Table 3 "The sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV), confidence intervals (CI), negative predictive value (NPV), likehood ratios +'ve (LR+) and likehood ratios -'ve (LR-) for predicting ovulation within 24 h at 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, and 40 mIU/ml thresholds on the 11th day of the cycle". Upon review of the tables prior to a journal club, it was noted that there were some numerical values that had been inadvertently misplaced under the wrong columns when updating different previously edited tables. The corrected Table 3 appears below. The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Leiva, R. A., Bouchard, T. P., Abdullah, S. H., & Ecochard, R. (2018, November 30). Corrigendum: Urinary luteinizing hormone tests: Which concentration threshold best predicts ovulation? [Front. Public Health, 5, (2017) (320)] doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00320. Frontiers in Public Health. Frontiers Media S.A. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00345

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free