Research note: “should we stay or should we go? exploring the outcomes of great power retrenchment”

2Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Within foreign policy and academic circles in the United States and other western countries, retrenchment has become an increasingly controversial topic. In spite of the increased attention, there have been few empirical studies that rigorously examine the outcomes of great power retrenchment. In this paper, we seek to fill this gap by performing a quantitative analysis of great power retrenchment outcomes from 1870–2007. Counter to the retrenchment pessimists’ expectations, we find that retrenchment leads to relatively positive outcomes for declining states. States that choose to retrench experience shorter periods of economic decline and are less likely to be the target of predatory conflict initiation.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Atkinson, D. B., & Williford, G. W. (2016). Research note: “should we stay or should we go? exploring the outcomes of great power retrenchment.” Research and Politics, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168016682888

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free