The Evidence Base for Revascularisation of Chronic Total Occlusions

  • Bagnall A
  • Spyridopoulos I
13Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

When patients with ischaemic heart disease are considered for revascularisation the Heart Team's aim is to choose a therapy that will provide complete relief of angina for an acceptable procedural risk. Complete functional revascularisation of ischaemic myocardium is thus the goal and for this reason the presence of a chronic total occlusion (CTO) - which remain the most technically challenging lesions to revascularise percutaneously - is the most common reason for selecting coronary artery bypass surgery. From the behaviour of Heart Teams it is clear that physicians believe that CTOs are important. Yet when faced with patients with CTOs for whom surgery appears excessive (e.g. nonproximal LAD) or too high risk, there remains a reluctance to undertake CTO PCI, despite significant recent advances in procedural success and safety and a considerable body of evidence supporting a survival benefit following successful CTO PCI. This article reviews the relationship between CTOs, symptoms of angina, ischaemia and left ventricular dysfunction and further explores the evidence relating their treatment to improved quality of life and prognosis in patients with these features.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bagnall, A., & Spyridopoulos, I. (2014). The Evidence Base for Revascularisation of Chronic Total Occlusions. Current Cardiology Reviews, 10(2), 88–98. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573403x10666140331125659

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free