Using transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) to investigate why faces are and are not special

15Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We believe we are now in a position to answer the question, "Are faces special?" inasmuch as this applies to the face inversion effect (better performance for upright vs inverted faces). Using a double-blind, between-subject design, in two experiments (n = 96) we applied a specific tDCS procedure targeting the Fp3 area while participants performed a matching-task with faces (Experiment 1a) or checkerboards from a familiar prototype-defined category (Experiment 1b). Anodal tDCS eliminated the checkerboard inversion effect reliably obtained in the sham group, but only reduced it for faces (although the reduction was significant). Thus, there is a component to the face inversion effect that we are not affecting with a tDCS procedure that can eliminate the checkerboard inversion effect. We suggest that the reduction reflects the loss of an expertise-based component in the face inversion effect, and the residual is due to a face-specific component of that effect.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Civile, C., Quaglia, S., Waguri, E., Ward, M., McLaren, R., & McLaren, I. P. L. (2021). Using transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) to investigate why faces are and are not special. Scientific Reports, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83844-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free