Clinical outcomes with a systolic blood pressure lower than 120 mmHg in older patients with high disease burden

3Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: The target blood pressure in older patients is controversial. Recent studies provided clinical evidence supporting a target systolic blood pressure <120 mmHg in patients >50 years at high risk of cardiovascular events. Methods: Retrospective study of 380 consecutive patients ≥60 years with stages 1–5 pre-dialysis chronic kidney disease seen between January 2013 and November 2015. The outcomes of a systolic blood pressure <120 mmHg in older patients with chronic kidney disease and multiple comorbidities were analyzed. Results: Sixty-eight patients had a systolic blood pressure <120 mmHg, 312 patients had a systolic blood pressure ≥120 mmHg. Forty-three patients died during the follow up (11.3%). Patients with a systolic blood pressure <120 mmHg had a higher risk of death: 21 (30.9%) vs 22 (7%). Primary cause of death: Cardiovascular: 11 (25.6%), infectious 9 (20.9%), cancer 5 (11.6%), renal failure 6 (13.9%), COPD/pulmonary fibrosis 2 (4.6%), end stage liver disease 3 (6.9%), traumatic brain injury 1 (2.3%), gastrointestinal hemorrhage 4 (9.3%), complications of diabetes 1 (2.3%), unknown 1 (2.3%). After adjusting for confounding factors, a systolic blood pressure <120 mmHg remained associated with increased mortality. There was a trend to more cardiovascular outcomes in those with a lower blood pressure. Conclusions: A systolic blood pressure below 120 mmHg in older patients with high disease burden was associated with adverse outcomes. Individualization of blood pressure therapy to each specific patient is warranted.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Franco Palacios, C. R., Haugen, E. N., Thompson, A. M., Rasmussen, R. W., Goracke, N., & Goyal, P. (2016). Clinical outcomes with a systolic blood pressure lower than 120 mmHg in older patients with high disease burden. Renal Failure, 38(9), 1364–1369. https://doi.org/10.1080/0886022X.2016.1227924

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free