Political participation is frequently defined as either being conventional or unconventional. This distinction is based on dualistic thinking. Participation is likened to other dualisms, such as legal-illegal, collective-individual, and unity-plurality. Drawing on Niklas Luhmann’s system theory, I argue that understanding political participation in terms of dualisms is reductive, as it overlooks those acts of participation that do not fit the conventional-unconventional distinction. To address this issue, the article introduces the notion of alternative political participation. This category is established by conceiving the existing dualism between conventional and unconventional political participation as a continuum of options existing between polar opposites.
CITATION STYLE
Kaim, M. (2021). Rethinking Modes of Political Participation; The Conventional, Unconventional, and Alternative. Democratic Theory, 8(1), 50–70. https://doi.org/10.3167/dt.2021.080104
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.