Rethinking Modes of Political Participation; The Conventional, Unconventional, and Alternative

9Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Political participation is frequently defined as either being conventional or unconventional. This distinction is based on dualistic thinking. Participation is likened to other dualisms, such as legal-illegal, collective-individual, and unity-plurality. Drawing on Niklas Luhmann’s system theory, I argue that understanding political participation in terms of dualisms is reductive, as it overlooks those acts of participation that do not fit the conventional-unconventional distinction. To address this issue, the article introduces the notion of alternative political participation. This category is established by conceiving the existing dualism between conventional and unconventional political participation as a continuum of options existing between polar opposites.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kaim, M. (2021). Rethinking Modes of Political Participation; The Conventional, Unconventional, and Alternative. Democratic Theory, 8(1), 50–70. https://doi.org/10.3167/dt.2021.080104

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free