The potential of budgetary discharge for political accountability: Which lessons from the case of Frontex?

4Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

With the discharge procedure of the 2020 budget of Frontex, the European Parliament played a primary role in addressing the policy drift of the most important decentralised agency operating in the area of freedom, security and justice (AFSJ). This case demonstrates the potential of the discharge tool in steering the performance of decentralised agencies at a time when the mandate of these agencies within the EU executive order is affected by a structural accountability deficit. Confronted with a Rule of Law crisis in the AFSJ, the European Parliament has effectively leveraged the evolving normative framework to imbue the discharge process with significant political oversight functions. In this article, I aim to show that a constitutional dimension of the discharge procedure can be conceptualised, enabling the European Parliament to reaffirm its political account-holder role as derived from the Treaties and ensure agencies' compliance with their EU-oriented mandate.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gigli, M. (2024). The potential of budgetary discharge for political accountability: Which lessons from the case of Frontex? European Law Journal, 30(1–2), 238–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12509

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free