MATHS ANXIETY: FURTHER COMPLICATED BY SPREADSHEET SHOCK?

  • Smailes J
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper offers an augmentation to the work of Smailes and Heyman (2018) and Farjadpour and Fresneda-Portillo (2018). Smailes and Heyman (2018) considered techniques for teaching mathematics to non-mathematicians (e.g. business programmes) whilst Farjadpour and Fresneda-Portillo (2018) considered mathematics anxiety. What was particularly salient about the latter study was that it involved undergraduate mathematics students. This struck a particular chord with the first presenter: if mathematics anxiety occurred in students choosing this as a specialism, what additional impacts could be occurring within Business based cohorts? Are there further complexities that require consideration within these cohorts? For example, past experience indicates that the advent of technologies, in this case spreadsheets, can be both a blessing and a curse. Hesse and Hesse-Scerno (2009) posit that spreadsheets have changed the world and suggest that they have potentially saved some mathematics based business curricula. Spreadsheets are now a universal business tool that needs to be learned (Pan et al., 2018). What are the potential relationships between mathematics anxiety and spreadsheet confidence? Do similar factors that impact on mathematics anxiety impact on spreadsheet confidence? This paper illustrates that indeed there are a number of similarities between the two and suggest the impact of technologies is such that techno-math literacies supersedes numeracy capability as a concept (Geiger, Goos, & Forgasz, 2015). Furthermore, additional dynamics linked to confidence are exposed that merit further qualitative investigation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Smailes, J., & Fresneda-Portillo, C. (2019). MATHS ANXIETY: FURTHER COMPLICATED BY SPREADSHEET SHOCK? In Education and New Developments 2019 (Vol. 2, pp. 61–65). inScience Press. https://doi.org/10.36315/2019v2end013

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free