Sociocultural variation in attitudes toward use of genetic information and participation in genetic research by race in the United States: Implications for precision medicine

29Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background "Precision medicine" (PM) requires researchers to identify actionable genetic risks and for clinicians to interpret genetic testing resultsto patients. Whether PM will equally benefit all populations or exacerbate existing disparities is uncertain.Methods We ascertained attitudes toward genetic testing and genetic research by race in the United States using the online Amazon mTurk USworkforce (n=403 White; n=56 African American (AA)). Generalized linear models were used to test differences in beliefs and preferences byrace, adjusting for sociodemographics and prior genetic experience.Results AA were less likely than White to believe that genetic tests should be promoted or made available. Further, AA were less likely to want genetictesting results or to participate in genetic research.Conclusions Important dimensions that underlay PM are not universally accepted by all populations. Without clear attention to concerns, AA communitiesmay not equally benefit from the rapidly-emerging trend in PM-centered research and clinical practice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dye, T., Li, D., Demment, M., Groth, S., Fernandez, D., Dozier, A., & Chang, J. (2016). Sociocultural variation in attitudes toward use of genetic information and participation in genetic research by race in the United States: Implications for precision medicine. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 23(4), 782–786. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocv214

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free