N'zassa: From a collaborative translation approach to a collective construct

0Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The ethnographic approach to literary translation offers, undoubtedly, many avenues yet to be explored. If we can consider translation to be a perpetual search for a possibility, dialogic translation consists of waging with the 'other'-be they present physically and/or metaphysically-the battle for meaning. The n'zassa approach has no aim but to both reinforce the translator's visibility and build a trustworthy relationship with (trans)readers. I argue that every translation act is-or should be-based, to some extent, on a n'zassa approach, which sees translation practice as a collaborative activity, and its product, a collective construct wherein writers, translators and readers are Meaning Weavers. Each text carries an embryo of such an encounter, which stems from and results in mutual influences. With regard to the relation ethnography-translation, Buzelin (2004, 2005), Ferreira (2014, 2017) and Wolf's (2000) discussions prove fundamental. I conclude that Adiaffi's n'zassa, read through the lens of Latour's (2008) ant, helps reduce information lost and gives the translator a type of immediate collective acceptance. It is only through dialogue between subjects and forms, between divergent and convergent choices in the practice of translation that one can strive for a real and inclusive knowledge economy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

N’gana, Y. (2019). N’zassa: From a collaborative translation approach to a collective construct. Mutatis Mutandis, 12(2), 519–539. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.mut.v12n2a09

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free