Hygiene in the Prevention of Udder Infections II. Evaluation of Oil-Based Teat Dips

20Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Oil-based teat dips containing iodine at .5 and 1% were compared in a series of studies with two water-based iodophor products of the same concentration and also with undipped controls. When the two types of products were tested at .5% under conditions of natural infection, the water-based dip was four times more effective than the oil-based dip at preventing Staphylococcus aureus infections. In three subsequent trials teats were experimentally exposed to S. aureus and Streptococcus agalactiae. Five times more S. aureus infections developed in a group dipped with the oil-based product at .5% iodine than in an undipped control. Comparison of the oil-based dip at 1% iodine with an undipped control yielded no significant difference for aureus infections. The 1% iodine water-based product was nine times more effective in preventing S. aureus infections than the 1% oil-based product. Differences in the incidence of S. agalactiae infections were nonsignificant within the individual trials. Though ineffective in preventing udder infections oil-based products were effective in creating a supple condition of teat skin. © 1975, American Dairy Science Association. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Philpot, W. N., & Pankey, J. W. (1975). Hygiene in the Prevention of Udder Infections II. Evaluation of Oil-Based Teat Dips. Journal of Dairy Science, 58(2), 205–208. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(75)84546-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free