A practical solution to pseudoreplication bias in single-cell studies

170Citations
Citations of this article
342Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Cells from the same individual share common genetic and environmental backgrounds and are not statistically independent; therefore, they are subsamples or pseudoreplicates. Thus, single-cell data have a hierarchical structure that many current single-cell methods do not address, leading to biased inference, highly inflated type 1 error rates, and reduced robustness and reproducibility. This includes methods that use a batch effect correction for individual as a means of accounting for within-sample correlation. Here, we document this dependence across a range of cell types and show that pseudo-bulk aggregation methods are conservative and underpowered relative to mixed models. To compute differential expression within a specific cell type across treatment groups, we propose applying generalized linear mixed models with a random effect for individual, to properly account for both zero inflation and the correlation structure among measures from cells within an individual. Finally, we provide power estimates across a range of experimental conditions to assist researchers in designing appropriately powered studies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zimmerman, K. D., Espeland, M. A., & Langefeld, C. D. (2021). A practical solution to pseudoreplication bias in single-cell studies. Nature Communications , 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21038-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free