The uncertain place of the child's best interests in ECtHR's immigration case law

1Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

It has been highlighted that in the area of immigration law the protection offered by the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) to children and family life is arguably at its weakest. The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) immigration case law on Article 8 ECHR has shown an uneven and uncertain application of the child's best interests. Little significance is attached to the child's respect for family life when determining whether the immigration measure is compatible with the ECHR. This paper will explore how the Court is identifying the best interests of the child and analyse what weight the Court apportions to the best interests of the child when balancing the state's and the applicant's interests. It will also examine whether the Court prioritize migration control over the child's best interests in cases where both family matters and immigration matters are involved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Edlund, J., & Stehlík, V. (2020). The uncertain place of the child’s best interests in ECtHR’s immigration case law. International and Comparative Law Review, 20(2), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2020-0019

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free