What’s Wrong with Joyguzzling?

78Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Our thesis is that there is no moral requirement to refrain from emitting reasonable amounts of greenhouse gases (GHGs) solely in order to enjoy oneself. Joyriding in a gas guzzler (joyguzzling) provides our paradigm example. We first distinguish this claim that there is no moral requirement to refrain from joyguzzling from other more radical claims. We then review several different proposed objections to our view. These include: the claim that joyguzzling exemplifies a vice, causes or contributes to harm, has negative expected value, exceeds our fair share of global emissions, and undermines political duties. We show why none of these objections succeeds and conclude that no good reason has yet been proposed that shows why joyguzzling violates a moral requirement.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kingston, E., & Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2018). What’s Wrong with Joyguzzling? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 21(1), 169–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-017-9859-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free