An integrated clinical approach to predicting the benefit of tirofiban in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes: Application of the TIMI risk score for UA/NSTEMI in PRISM-PLUS

208Citations
Citations of this article
59Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aims: We evaluated the TIMI Risk Score for Unstable Angina and Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction for predicting clinical outcomes and the efficacy of tirofiban in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes. Methods and Results: Developed in TIMI 11B, the risk score is calculated as the sum of seven presenting characteristics (age ≥65 years, ≥3 cardiac risk factors, documented coronary disease, recent severe angina, ST deviation ≥0.5 mm, elevated cardiac markers, prior aspirin use). The risk score was validated in the PRISM-PLUS database (n=1915) and tested for interaction with the efficacy of tirofiban+heparin vs heparin alone. The risk score revealed an increasing gradient of risk for death, myocardial infarction or recurrent ischaemia at 14 days ranging from 7.7-30.5% (P<0.001). Dichotomized at the median, patients with a score ≥4 derived a greater relative risk reduction with tirofiban (P(Interaction)=0.025). Among patients with normal creatine kinase myocardial bands, the risk score showed a 3.5-fold gradient of risk (P<0.001) and identified a population that derived significant benefit from tirofiban (RR 0.73, P=0.027). Conclusion: The TIMI Risk Score is a simple clinical tool for risk assessment that may aid in the early identification of patients who should be considered for treatment with potent antiplatelet therapy. © 2001 The European Society of Cardiology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Morrow, D. A., Antman, E. M., Snapinn, S. M., McCabe, C. H., Theroux, P., & Braunwald, E. (2002). An integrated clinical approach to predicting the benefit of tirofiban in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes: Application of the TIMI risk score for UA/NSTEMI in PRISM-PLUS. European Heart Journal, 23(3), 223–229. https://doi.org/10.1053/euhj.2001.2738

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free