Structural explanations and norms: comments on Haslanger

3Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Sally Haslanger undertakes groundbreaking work in developing an account of structural explanations and the social structures that figure in them. A chief virtue of the account is that it can show the importance of structural explanations while also respecting the role of individual autonomy in explaining many decisions, by demonstrating the way in which social structures may set up a ‘choice architecture’ in which these choices are made. This paper gives an overview of this achievement, and goes on to consider why there may be need to broaden the role of social structural explanations beyond those that involve explicit choice within a choice architecture. It develops the idea, familiar from work by Heidegger and Ingarden, that social artifacts, roles, and nodes in social structures may be constitutively defined by norms. It closes by suggesting that attention to the role of norms in social structures may enable us to broaden the account to include structural explanations of other kinds.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Thomasson, A. L. (2016). Structural explanations and norms: comments on Haslanger. Philosophical Studies, 173(1), 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-014-0437-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free