Lack of Free Choice Reveals the Cost of Having to Search for More Than One Object

36Citations
Citations of this article
94Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

It is debated whether people can actively search for more than one object or whether this results in switch costs. Using a gaze-contingent eye-tracking paradigm, we revealed a crucial role for cognitive control in multiple-target search. We instructed participants to simultaneously search for two target objects presented among distractors. In one condition, both targets were available, which gave the observer free choice of what to search for and allowed for proactive control. In the other condition, only one of the two targets was available, so that the choice was imposed, and a reactive mechanism would be required. No switch costs emerged when target choice was free, but switch costs emerged reliably when targets were imposed. Bridging contradictory findings, the results are consistent with models of visual selection in which only one attentional template actively drives selection and in which the efficiency of switching targets depends on the type of cognitive control allowed for by the environment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ort, E., Fahrenfort, J. J., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2017). Lack of Free Choice Reveals the Cost of Having to Search for More Than One Object. Psychological Science, 28(8), 1137–1147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617705667

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free