FullSWOF Paral: Comparison of two parallelization strategies (MPI and SKELGIS) on a software designed for hydrology applications

  • Cordier S
  • Coullon H
  • Delestre O
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this paper, we perform a comparison of two approaches for the parallelization of an existing, free software, FullSWOF 2D (http://www. univ-orleans.fr/mapmo/soft/FullSWOF/ that solves shallow water equations for applications in hydrology) based on a domain decomposition strategy. The first approach is based on the classical MPI library while the second approach uses Parallel Algorithmic Skeletons and more precisely a library named SkelGIS (Skeletons for Geographical Information Systems). The first results presented in this article show that the two approaches are similar in terms of performance and scalability. The two implementation strategies are however very different and we discuss the advantages of each one.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cordier, S., Coullon, H., Delestre, O., Laguerre, C., Le, M. H., Pierre, D., & Sadaka, G. (2013). FullSWOF Paral: Comparison of two parallelization strategies (MPI and SKELGIS) on a software designed for hydrology applications. ESAIM: Proceedings, 43, 59–79. https://doi.org/10.1051/proc/201343004

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free