Formulating guidelines for the systematic setup of experiential material characterization studies: A case of plastic demonstrators

3Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Materials can be considered from a technical and experiential perspective. However, the latter perspective is more complex to study systematically. Four intertwined experiential levels describe the overall materials experience: sensorial, interpretive, affective, and performative level. Building upon the need in experiential material characterization for comparable physical material representations to enable within-material-class comparisons and the inclusion of extensive user aspects, this paper sums up the reasoning process regarding the understanding and design of an experimental set-up and its parameters of a specific case. The case objective is to formulate guidelines for the designer/researcher to set up experiential material characterization experiments with (i) plastic demonstrator forms and (ii) by consumers. Following elements are discussed: Assessors, Stimuli, Interaction Modalities, Dependent variables, Method, and Practical considerations. Next, future experiments can be carried out in order to generate holistic plastic material data on a larger scale, that can be collected in an experiential database and used by designers throughout the design process.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Veelaert, L., Moons, I., & du Bois, E. (2021). Formulating guidelines for the systematic setup of experiential material characterization studies: A case of plastic demonstrators. In Proceedings of the Design Society (Vol. 1, pp. 1587–1596). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2021.420

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free