Classical Rationalism and Contemporary Realism: Oaths of Office as Empty Formality or Empowering Function?

2Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

The practice of making oaths comes from ancient times, a tradition common to nearly all peoples and cultures. Calls for ethics reform in recent years have included questions about how or whether oaths are honored. In the fraught politics of today’s secularized, pluralistic society, skepticism about oaths may be warranted, but it is insufficient as the topic deserves critical reflection. The purpose of this exploratory study is to assess the efficacy of oaths of office. This is accomplished by subjecting them to both philosophical normative ethics and contemporary behavioral ethics examination. The analysis concludes by offering recommendations to reinforce the significance of this once-venerable bond between the populace and public servants.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bowman, J. S., & West, J. P. (2022). Classical Rationalism and Contemporary Realism: Oaths of Office as Empty Formality or Empowering Function? Public Integrity, 24(2), 202–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2021.1902035

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free