Reliability and validity of a steadiness score

8Citations
Citations of this article
58Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the internal consistency and construct and predictive validity of three survey questions regarding steadiness in a sample of community-dwelling lower-income older adults. DESIGN: A 6-month prospective cohort study. SETTING: Community-based. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred fifty-seven older adults who completed a baseline and 6-month follow-up interviewer- administered survey. These older adults received care at a single, public health system and were judged by insurance status to be of low income. MEASUREMENTS: Self-report measures of steadiness while walking and transferring; difficulty in mobility, activities of daily living (ADLs), and instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs); chronic illness; falls; hospitalization; and sociodemographic characteristics. RESULTS: The three steadiness questions showed good internal consistency (0.88); construct validity in Pearson correlations with mobility (0.57), ADL (0.53), and IADL scores (0.41); and predictive validity. With regard to predictive validity, steadiness was predictive of falls, hospitalization, and decline in ADL and IADL function over a subsequent 6-month period. CONCLUSION: Steadiness questions are a potentially valuable addition to survey research and clinical screening to identify persons with current impairment status and falls and disability risk. © 2005 by the American Geriatrics Society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Clark, D. O., Callahan, C. M., & Counsell, S. R. (2005). Reliability and validity of a steadiness score. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53(9), 1582–1586. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53485.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free