Rejoinder to Dranove and Shanley

9Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In their note in this issue of the journal, Dranove and Shanley critique our use of a 15 mile radius measure in various papers and propose an alternative. While we believe their critique is based on a misunderstanding of our work, their suggestion provides the opportunity for us to discuss how such market measures might be developed. © 1990.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Luft, H. S., Phibbs, C. S., Garnick, D. W., & Robinson, J. C. (1990). Rejoinder to Dranove and Shanley. Journal of Health Economics, 8(4), 479–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6296(90)90029-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free