Aim: This study was conducted to evaluate the accuracy of linear measurements performed on mandibularanaesthetic landmarks obtained by ultra-low-dose cone beam computed tomography and digital panoramicradiography in comparison with real measurement on dry mandible.Method: A total number of nine dry human mandibles were selected and mandibular anaesthetic landmarkswere marked using gutta-percha. The dry mandibles were submitted for digital panoramic radiography andcone beam computed tomography with mini-dose parameters using the SOREDEX CRANEX™ 3Dx unit,linear measurements were performed on SCANORA Lite image viewer and on Demand 3D viewer. The reallinear measurements were measured using digital caliper.Results: There was a statistically significant difference in all measurements performed on digital panoramicradiographs,reformatted panoramic images underestimate real linear vertical measurements withoutsignificant difference, the absolute error for the cross-sectional views of CBCT ranged from 0.0001 to1.44mm for mandibular foramen linear measurements, using mini-dose parameters did not affect imagequality nor measurements accuracy.Conclusions: Linear measurements driven from CBCT cross-sectional images using On Demand softwareare accurate and have the lowest error value; therefore it is considered one of the most important imagingmodality for preoperative surgical site assessment.
CITATION STYLE
Hala Wafik El Fayoumy, Hoda Abd El Kader Saleh, Mohamed Khalifa Zayet, & Iman Dakhli. (2021). Accuracy of Linear Measurements of Ultra-Low Dose Cone Beam Computed Tomography and Digital Panoramic Radiography Performed on Mandibular Anaesthetic Landmarks Versus Real Mandibular Measurements: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study. Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, 12(2), 139–146. https://doi.org/10.37506/ijphrd.v12i2.14107
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.