Few-shot meta-learning for concrete strength prediction: a model-agnostic approach with SHAP analysis

7Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Predicting concrete compressive strength with limited data remains a critical challenge in civil engineering. This study proposes a novel framework integrating Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning (MAML) with SHAP (Shapley Additive Explanations) to improve predictive accuracy and interpretability in data-scarce scenarios. Unlike conventional machine learning models that require extensive data, the MAML-based approach enables rapid adaptation to new tasks using minimal samples, offering robust generalization in few-shot learning contexts. The proposed pipeline includes structured preprocessing, normalization, a neural network-based meta-learning core, and SHAP-based feature attribution. A curated dataset of 430 samples was used, focusing on 28-day compressive strength, with input features including cement, water, aggregates, admixtures, and age. Compared to standard models like XGBoost and Random Forest, the MAML framework achieved superior performance, with MAE = 3.56 MPa, RMSE = 5.55 MPa, and R2 = 0.913. SHAP analysis revealed nonlinear interactions and dominant factors like water-cement ratio, curing age, and aggregate content. Statistical validation via the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test confirmed the significance of the model’s improvements (p < 0.05). Furthermore, SHAP insights closely align with domain knowledge and mix design principles, enhancing model transparency for practical application. This work demonstrates the applicability of meta-learning in civil engineering and provides a scalable, interpretable solution for strength prediction in real-world, data-limited conditions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gazi, M. U., Hasan, M. T., & Debnath, P. (2025). Few-shot meta-learning for concrete strength prediction: a model-agnostic approach with SHAP analysis. AI in Civil Engineering, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43503-025-00064-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free