Susceptible-infected-susceptible model: A comparison of N-intertwined and heterogeneous mean-field approximations

98Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We introduce the ε-susceptible-infected-susceptible (SIS) spreading model, which is taken as a benchmark for the comparison between the N-intertwined approximation and the Pastor-Satorras and Vespignani heterogeneous mean-field (HMF) approximation of the SIS model. The N-intertwined approximation, the HMF approximation, and the ε-SIS spreading model are compared for different graph types. We focus on the epidemic threshold and the steady-state fraction of infected nodes in networks with different degree distributions. Overall, the N-intertwined approximation is superior to the HMF approximation. The N-intertwined approximation is exactly the same as the HMF approximation in regular graphs. However, for some special graph types, such as the square lattice graph and the path graph, the two mean-field approximations are both very different from the ε-SIS spreading model. © 2012 American Physical Society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Li, C., Van De Bovenkamp, R., & Van Mieghem, P. (2012). Susceptible-infected-susceptible model: A comparison of N-intertwined and heterogeneous mean-field approximations. Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 86(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.86.026116

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free