Central blood pressure for the management of hypertension: Is it a practical clinical tool in current practice?

33Citations
Citations of this article
97Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Since noninvasive central blood pressure (BP) measuring devices are readily available, central BP has gained growing attention regarding its clinical application in the management of hypertension. The disagreement between central and peripheral BP has long been recognized. Some previous studies showed that noninvasive central BP may be better than the conventional brachial BP in association with target organ damages and long-term cardiovascular outcomes. Recent studies further suggest that the central BP strategy for confirming a diagnosis of hypertension may be more cost-effective than the conventional strategy, and guidance of hypertension management with central BP may result in less use of medications to achieve BP control. Despite the use of central BP being promising, more randomized controlled studies comparing central BP-guided therapeutic strategies with conventional care for cardiovascular events reduction are required because noninvasive central and brachial BP measures are conveniently available. In this brief review, the rationale supporting the utility of central BP in clinical practice and relating challenges are summarized.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cheng, H. M., Chuang, S. Y., Wang, T. D., Kario, K., Buranakitjaroen, P., Chia, Y. C., … Chen, C. H. (2020, March 1). Central blood pressure for the management of hypertension: Is it a practical clinical tool in current practice? Journal of Clinical Hypertension. Blackwell Publishing Inc. https://doi.org/10.1111/jch.13758

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free