Comparative characteristics of nests of vespula germanica (F.) and vespula vulgaris (L.) (hymenoptera: Vespinae) from christchurch city, new zealand

15Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

From July 1987 to June 1989,141 nests and 365 nests, respectively, of the adventive social vespines the German wasp, Vespula germanica (F.), and the common wasp V. vulgaris (L.), from the City of Christchurch, New Zealand, were evaluated for seven major characteristics. There were few, if any, differences in nest sites, and from spring to early summer in nest traffic, nest size, and numbers of combs. However, German wasps showed no preference for direction of nest entrances, while common wasp nests were more numerous in areas most exposed to the morning sun. Some German wasp nests survived the winter and began producing new worker cells by late June, but all common wasp nests died by June. Because common wasp nests have been reported surviving the winter in beech forest, which produces honey dew, and honey dew is not available in Christchurch City, common wasp nest survival over winter may be more dependent upon carbohydrates and/or prey dependent upon carbohydrates than the survival of German wasp nests. The presence of large, expanding wasp nests from early spring must impose localised predation pressures virtually unknown in the Northern Hemisphere where overwintering nests are rare. Wasp population dynamics, and impacts of wasps on fauna, are likely to vary between different geographical areas of New Zealand, but as targets for biological control, the two wasp species can generally be considered to be quite similar. © 1992 Crown.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Donovan, B. J., Howie, A. M. E., Schroeder, N. C., Wallace, A. R., & Read, P. E. C. (1992). Comparative characteristics of nests of vespula germanica (F.) and vespula vulgaris (L.) (hymenoptera: Vespinae) from christchurch city, new zealand. New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 19(1–2), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/03014223.1992.10423252

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free