Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Cancer Care An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

104Citations
Citations of this article
107Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) come directly from the patient, without clinician interpretation, to provide a patient-centered perspective. OBJECTIVE To understand the association of PROM integration into cancer care with patient-related, therapy-related, and health care utilization outcomes. DATA SOURCES Searches included MEDLINE and MEDLINE Epub ahead of print, in-process, and other nonindexed citations; Embase databases (OvidSP); PsychINFO; CENTRAL; and CINAHL from January 1, 2012 to September 26, 2022. STUDY SELECTION Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that enrolled adult patients (ages 18 years and older) with active cancer receiving anticancer therapy using a PROM as an intervention. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Pairs of review authors, using prepiloted forms, independently extracted trial characteristics, disease characteristics, and intervention details. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting guideline was followed. Random-effects analyses were conducted. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Overall mortality, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measures, and hospital utilization outcomes. RESULTS From 1996 to 2022, 45 RCTs including 13 661 participants addressed the association of PROMs with outcomes considered important to patients. The addition of a PROM likely reduced the risk of overall mortality (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.72-0.98; moderate certainty), improved HRQoL (range 0-100) at 12 weeks (mean difference [MD], 2.45; 95% CI, 0.42-4.48; moderate certainty). Improvements of HRQoL at 24 weeks were not significant (MD, 1.87; 95% CI, −1.21 to 4.96; low certainty). There was no association between the addition of a PROM and HRQoL at 48 weeks. The addition of a PROM was not associated with reduced ED visits (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.54-1.02; low certainty) or hospital admissions (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.73-1.02; low certainty). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE The findings of this study suggest that the integration of PROMs into cancer care may improve overall survival and quality of life.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Balitsky, A. K., Rayner, D., Britto, J., Lionel, A. C., Ginsberg, L., Cho, W., … Guyatt, G. H. (2024). Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Cancer Care An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JAMA Network Open, 7(8). https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.24793

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free