Complementary and Alternative Medicine: A Rising Healthcare Issue

  • Boon H
  • Verhoef M
  • Vanderheyden L
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

More than half of all Canadians use some form of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) every year. The way CAM is being used, the magnitude of its use and the lack of clarity on standards of evidence make CAM a rising healthcare issue. A recent research priority-setting exercise by the Canadian Interdisciplinary Network for CAM Research (IN-CAM) identified three research priority areas: (1) healthcare delivery and policy research, including (a) exploring if and how CAM should be regulated, (b) defining what constitutes acceptable evidence of safety and efficacy, (c) investigating the organization and delivery of integrative healthcare; (2) methodological research, including exploring how best to assess whole systems of care and how to choose patient-, practitioner- and policy-relevant outcome measures; and (3) knowledge transfer, including formal education strategies, the provision of information and dialogue with those who use information in decision-making. The high use of CAM products and therapies leads to many questions from patients, practitioners and policy makers. The research agenda presented here provides a guide to begin programs of research that will answer these questions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Boon, H., Verhoef, M., Vanderheyden, L., & Westlake, K. (2006). Complementary and Alternative Medicine: A Rising Healthcare Issue. Healthcare Policy | Politiques de Santé, 1(3), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.12927/hcpol.2006.18120

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free