Comparative Hearing: Insects

  • Hickling R
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) publication in 2009 on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level testing by Dutch general practitioners (GPs) in men aged ?40 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective study with a Dutch insurance company database (containing PSA test claims) and a large district hospital-laboratory database (containing PSA-test results). The difference in primary PSA-testing rate as well as follow-up testing before and after the ERSPC was tested using the chi-square test with statistical significance at P < 0.05. RESULTS: Decline in PSA tests 4 months after ERSPC publication, especially for men aged ?60 years. Primary testing as well as follow-up testing decreased, both for PSA levels of <4?ng/mL as well as for PSA levels of 4-10?ng/mL. Follow-up testing after a PSA level result of >10?ng/mL moderately increased (P = 0.171). Referral to a urologist after a PSA level result of >4?ng/mL decreased slightly after the ERSPC publication (P = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: After the ERSPC publication primary PSA testing as well as follow-up testing decreased. Follow-up testing seemed not to be adequate after an abnormal PSA result. The reasons for this remain unclear

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hickling, R. (2000). Comparative Hearing: Insects. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 108(5), 1974–1975. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1316097

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free