Systematic review of prognostic factors for work participation in patients with sciatica

23Citations
Citations of this article
131Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Sciatica impacts on the ability to work and may lead to a reduced return to work. This study reviewed and summarised prognostic factors of work participation in patients who received conservative or surgical treatment for clinically diagnosed sciatica. We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE and PsycINFO until January 2018. Cohort studies, using a measure of work participation as outcome, were included. Two independent reviewers performed study inclusion and used the Quality In Prognosis Studies tool for risk of bias assessment and GRADE to rate the quality of the evidence. Based on seven studies describing six cohorts (n=1408 patients) that assessed 21 potential prognostic factors, favourable factors for return to work (follow-up ranging from 3 months to 10 years) included younger age, better general health, less low back pain or sciatica bothersomeness, better physical function, negative straight leg raise-test, physician expecting surgery to be beneficial, better pain coping, less depression and mental stress, less fear of movement and low physical work load. Study results could not be pooled. Using GRADE, the quality of the evidence ranged from moderate to very low, with downgrading mainly for a high risk of bias and imprecision. Several prognostic factors like pain, disability and psychological factors were identified and reviewed, and these could be targeted using additional interventions to optimise return to work. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42016042497.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Oosterhuis, T., Smaardijk, V. R., Kuijer, P. P. F., Langendam, M. W., Frings-Dresen, M. H. W., & Hoving, J. L. (2019, October 1). Systematic review of prognostic factors for work participation in patients with sciatica. Occupational and Environmental Medicine. BMJ Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2019-105797

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free