PHYTOSAURIAN NOMENCLATURE: PARASUCHIA, BELODONTIA OR PHYTOSAURIA?

1Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The nomenclatural status of Phytosaurus Jæger is here analyzed in accordance with the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. In the past, several authors have interpreted it as both a family-group and/or a genus-group name, but each of these approaches fails in several articles of the Code. Phytosaurus Jæger is here interpreted as originally established for a collective-group and cannot be used as a nominal genus in binomina, but takes precedence over any other younger homonym, and the first available one is Phytosaurus Wagler . Being an invalid junior homonym, the class-group name Phytosauria Baur and the family-group name Phytosauridae Lydekker, which are based on Phytosaurus Wagler, are ultimately rejected. Conversely, the class-group names Parasuchia Huxley and Belodontia Brauns, as well as the family-group name Belodontidae Cope, are older but have some taxonomic restrictions in relation to Belodon plieningeri Meyer. To avoid proposing new names for old ones, the solution to fix the higher-order nomenclature for phytosaurs is to designate a neotype for Belodon plieningeri Meyer.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kischlat, E. E. (2022). PHYTOSAURIAN NOMENCLATURE: PARASUCHIA, BELODONTIA OR PHYTOSAURIA? Revista Brasileira de Paleontologia, 25(1), 38–50. https://doi.org/10.4072/rbp.2022.1.03

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free