Legal Philosophy of Pancasila as The Paradigm of The Criminal Justice System: A Philosophical Criticism for the Loss of a Sense of Humanity

  • Marbun R
  • Hakim A
  • Adystia Sunggara M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Since 1981, marked by the enactment of law number 8 of 1981 on criminal procedure law, it has become a consensus to abandon the Cartesian paradigm embodied in the inquisitoire principle. The inquisitoire principle sees any person drawn into a criminal justice struggle as an object. The Criminal Procedure Code (CPC) through the philosophical foundation of Pancasila, commands to adopt the accusatoire principle, in honor of the withdrawn party as a person entirely. However, the KUHAP/CPC formers forget the institutional legal culture of the thrown ( gowerfen-sein ) criminal justice system in the myth of modernity that is the objectification of human being. So that the law enforcement officers (investigators, public prosecutors, judges) always ignore Pancasila as the philosophical foundation of thought in carrying out the law.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Marbun, R., Hakim, A., & Adystia Sunggara, M. (2018). Legal Philosophy of Pancasila as The Paradigm of The Criminal Justice System: A Philosophical Criticism for the Loss of a Sense of Humanity. SHS Web of Conferences, 54, 07001. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20185407001

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free