Suppressing communities: An analysis of LGBTQ+ censorship in libraries

  • Stevens T
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Librarians serve as defenders of intellectual freedom and social responsibility, and this includes speaking out against censorship. Censorship of information, materials, and books occurs in the public, but censorship can also occur in libraries themselves. Those impacted the most by this censorship are marginalized communities, such as the LGBTQ+ community. The purpose of this paper is to explore how internal, external and institutional censorship affects the LGBTQ+ community and what librarians can do to uphold their defense against censorship. Internal, or self-censorship, occurs at the librarian level where LGBTQ+ materials may be hidden by librarians or library staff or simply not ordered due to pressure from the community the library serves. External censorship occurs at the community level where the community culture pushes for the censorship of LGBTQ+ materials. Lastly, institutional censorship occurs at the classification level where classification models such as the Dewey Decimal System or subject headings may not provide accurate representation for LGBTQ+ materials. In order to put an end to these forms of censorship, trained and certified librarians must act as agents of change, committing to their due diligence to provide information to all members of their communities.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stevens, T. (2020). Suppressing communities: An analysis of LGBTQ+ censorship in libraries. Pathfinder: A Canadian Journal for Information Science Students and Early Career Professionals, 1(2), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.29173/pathfinder15

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free