Comparison of baseline and postconcussion SCAT3 scores and symptoms in varsity athletes: An investigation into differences by sex and history of concussion

10Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective To investigate the use of the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 3 (SCAT3) as an assessment tool in the varsity population, as well as the effects of sex and concussion history on both baseline and postconcussion scores. Methods A comparison between baseline and postconcussion SCAT3 scores of varsity level athletes was conducted through retrospective chart review. Differences in both baseline and postconcussion scores were further analysed by sex and history of concussion. Results The only clinically significant change on the SCAT3 elicited by a concussion was that of self-reported symptoms. There were no clinically significant differences based on sex or history of concussion. Conclusion The SCAT3 in its entirety may not be useful in this population. Additional research on sociocultural and sport aspects that may be affecting symptom reporting in this population is needed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hurtubise, J. M., Hughes, C. E., Sergio, L. E., & Macpherson, A. K. (2018, July 1). Comparison of baseline and postconcussion SCAT3 scores and symptoms in varsity athletes: An investigation into differences by sex and history of concussion. BMJ Open Sport and Exercise Medicine. BMJ Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2017-000312

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free