Evaluating induced CCG parsers on grounded semantic parsing

13Citations
Citations of this article
106Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We compare the effectiveness of four different syntactic CCG parsers for a semantic slot-filling task to explore how much syntactic supervision is required for downstream semantic analysis. This extrinsic, task-based evaluation also provides a unique window into the semantics captured (or missed) by unsupervised grammar induction systems.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bisk, Y., Reddy, S., Blitzer, J., Hockenmaier, J., & Steedman, M. (2016). Evaluating induced CCG parsers on grounded semantic parsing. In EMNLP 2016 - Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Proceedings (pp. 2022–2027). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/d16-1214

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free