Risk governance as a line of defense: Systematic review of hotspots for future research

1Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

To forestall future financial crises, risk governance has been embraced as a line of defense. Therefore, this paper seeks to synthesize the risk governance literature, identifying gaps, and suggesting direction for future research, through a systematic literature review (SLR). Analyzing 151 papers from the Scopus and Web of Science databases, this paper finds a steady increase in academic work on risk governance. Using the theory, context, characteristics, and methodology (TCCM) framework, the study emphasizes the importance of chief risk officers, geographical context coverage, and effectiveness and regulation of risk governance. Methodologically, endogeneity issues are a major concern for researchers, agency theory (AT) being the most popular theory used. Finally, moderating and mediating variables that affect risk governance are identified as important but under-explored. While providing practitioners and policymakers with a framework, empirical testing is encouraged. The study contributes to SDG Goal 8, Target 10 of strengthening financial institutions and promoting a resilient financial system.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Addae, J. A., Mota, J., & Moreira, A. C. (2023). Risk governance as a line of defense: Systematic review of hotspots for future research. Cogent Business and Management. Cogent OA. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2215074

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free