Monetary Asymmetry and ESG Governance in the Eurozone: Mapping Evolving Risk Narratives Through Bibliometric Analysis

0Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper investigates how monetary and ESG-related risks—especially those stemming from asymmetric policy transmission across Eurozone economies—have evolved over time, with a focus on the post-COVID-19 era. Using a mixed-method bibliometric analysis of 216 peer-reviewed articles (1996–2025), it maps thematic developments in monetary governance and sustainability discourse. Findings reveal a post-2020 surge in scholarly engagement, marked by a decisive shift: ESG risks, once peripheral, are now central to discussions of macro-financial stability and institutional resilience. This thematic realignment aligns with major EU regulatory milestones (e.g., SFDR, EU Taxonomy, CSRD), signaling a structural transformation in EU governance. The study concludes that the convergence of monetary asymmetry and ESG integration represents a new frontier in economic policy and academic inquiry, raising critical questions about institutional convergence, regulatory capacity, and sustainability-informed monetary frameworks in post-crisis Europe.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Garefalakis, A., Angelaki, E., Papademetriou, C., Giannopoulos, P., & Kourgiantakis, M. (2026). Monetary Asymmetry and ESG Governance in the Eurozone: Mapping Evolving Risk Narratives Through Bibliometric Analysis. Risks, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/risks14020024

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free