False biochemical diagnosis of hyperthyroidism in streptavidin-biotin-based immunoassays: The problem of biotin intake and related interferences

115Citations
Citations of this article
101Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Immunoassays are now commonly used for hormone measurement, in high throughput analytical platforms. Immunoassays are generally robust to interference. However, endogenous analytical error may occur in some patients; this may be encountered in biotin supplementation or in the presence of anti-streptavidin antibody, in immunoassays involving streptavidin-biotin interaction. In these cases, the interference may induce both false positive and false negative results, and simulate a seemingly coherent hormonal profile. It is to be feared that this type of errors will be more frequently observed. This review underlines the importance of keeping close interactions between biologists and clinicians to be able to correlate the hormonal assay results with the clinical picture.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Piketty, M. L., Polak, M., Flechtner, I., Gonzales-Briceño, L., & Souberbielle, J. C. (2017, June 1). False biochemical diagnosis of hyperthyroidism in streptavidin-biotin-based immunoassays: The problem of biotin intake and related interferences. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Walter de Gruyter GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2016-0606

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free