Scaling Up Pro-Poor Agrobiodiversity Interventions as a Development Option

1Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Pro-poor interventions that use agrobiodiversity for development actions are widely considered relevant only at small scales. Agrobiodiversity interventions are often left out of national-level/large-scale development planning. Scaling-up modalities include adaptation, diffusion, replication, value addition, and temporal scaling up. We undertook a review of 119 interventions that use agrobiodiversity for both the crop and the livestock sector. The interventions ranged from improving the availability of materials and information through management and market-oriented actions to changing norms and enabling policies. The interventions are also organized in accordance with farming-community goals and constraints. The open-access multilingual Diversity Assessment Tool for Agrobiodiversity and Resilience (DATAR) was created as a framework to systemize and structure agrobiodiversity interventions under different scaling-up modalities for the on-the-ground field assessment and scaling-up of agrobiodiversity interventions. The use of the framework enabled the scaling up of small-scale interventions that use agrobiodiversity to have impact on agricultural development at larger spatial and temporal scales.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bernis-Fonteneau, A., Alcadi, R., Frangella, M., & Jarvis, D. I. (2023, July 1). Scaling Up Pro-Poor Agrobiodiversity Interventions as a Development Option. Sustainability (Switzerland). Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310526

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free