Ex vivo postimplantation biomechanical properties of a press-fit cementless femoral stem with transfixation pin for canine total hip replacement

1Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To compare ex vivo postimplantation biomechanical characteristics of 3 implants for canine total hip replacement: a cementless press-fit femoral stem with a pin in the femoral neck (p-pfFS), a press-fit cementless femoral stem without this pin (pfFS), and a cemented femoral stem (cFS). SAMPLE 18 cadaveric femurs from 9 dogs. PROCEDURES Femurs were assigned randomly to 3 groups, and biomechanical testing was performed by measuring vertical displacement during cyclic loading and resistance to failure with compression parallel to the longitudinal axis of the femur. Force-displacement curves were assessed for failure tests, and work necessary for failure was calculated. RESULTS No significant differences were observed in vertical displacement during cyclic loading (P =.263) or work necessary for failure (P =.079). Loads to failure for cFS and p-pfFS implants were significantly greater than that for the pfFS, but no significant difference in load to failure was observed between cFS and p-pfFS implants (P =.48). CLINICAL RELEVANCE Cementless femoral stems with a transfixation pin offer significantly greater immediate resistance to failure to com-pressive loads parallel to the longitudinal axis of the femur than standard cementless stems, and a level of stability comparable to that of cemented stems. p-pfFS implants may be valuable in total hip replacement, potentially reducing the risk of fracture during the early postoperative period prior to osteointegration.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Saban, C., Roles, J., Deprey, J., Massenzio, M., Viguier, E., & Cachon, T. (2022). Ex vivo postimplantation biomechanical properties of a press-fit cementless femoral stem with transfixation pin for canine total hip replacement. American Journal of Veterinary Research, 83(11). https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.22.05.0084

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free