Abstract
In recent years, a number of scholars have argued that the traditional negative image of Paul I is in need of substantial revision. Even Boris Nolde’s seminal history of the Russian Empire presents the emperor in an uncomplimentary light, as a man who was greedy for territory but not an astute analyst of the information available to guide his decisions. If no one has yet claimed that Paul was an exceptionally wise and able man, some historians, at least, have shown that he was neither as foolish nor as mad as the partisans of Catherine and Alexander would have him be. Hugh Ragsdale has argued that Paul was far more aware of Russia’s international interests and more assertive in policy making than is usually thought.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Atkin, M. (1979). The Pragmatic Diplomacy of Paul I: Russia’s Relations with Asia, 1796–1801. Slavic Review, 38(1), 60–74. https://doi.org/10.2307/2497227
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.