A comparison of the resection rate for cold and hot snare polypectomy for 4-9 mm colorectal polyps: A multicentre randomised controlled trial (CRESCENT study)

179Citations
Citations of this article
110Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective To investigate the success rate of cold snare polypectomy (CSP) for complete resection of 4-9 mm colorectal adenomatous polyps compared with that of hot snare polypectomy (HSP). Design A prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled, parallel, non-inferiority trial conducted in 12 Japanese endoscopy units. Endoscopically diagnosed sessile adenomatous polyps, 4-9 mm in size, were randomly assigned to the CSP or HSP group. After complete removal of the polyp using the allocated technique, biopsy specimens from the resection margin after polypectomy were obtained. The primary endpoint was the complete resection rate, defined as no evidence of adenomatous tissue in the biopsied specimens, among all pathologically confirmed adenomatous polyps. Results A total of 796 eligible polyps were detected in 538 of 912 patients screened for eligibility between September 2015 and August 2016. The complete resection rate for CSP was 98.2% compared with 97.4% for HSP. The non-inferiority of CSP for complete resection compared with HSP was confirmed by the +0.8% (90% CI 1.0 to 2.7) complete resection rate (non-inferiority p<0.0001). Postoperative bleeding requiring endoscopic haemostasis occurred only in the HSP group (0.5%, 2 of 402 polyps). Conclusions The complete resection rate for CSP is not inferior to that for HSP. CSP can be one of the standard techniques for 4-9 mm colorectal polyps. (Study registration: UMIN000018328)

References Powered by Scopus

Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models

14754Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths

2467Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline

851Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Endoscopic Removal of Colorectal Lesions—Recommendations by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer

206Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Comparison of Underwater vs Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Intermediate-Size Colorectal Polyps

131Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Endoscopic Removal of Colorectal Lesions: Recommendations by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer

108Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kawamura, T., Takeuchi, Y., Asai, S., Yokota, I., Akamine, E., Kato, M., … Tanaka, K. (2018). A comparison of the resection rate for cold and hot snare polypectomy for 4-9 mm colorectal polyps: A multicentre randomised controlled trial (CRESCENT study). Gut, 67(11), 1950–1957. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314215

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 21

53%

Researcher 10

25%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

15%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 43

88%

Computer Science 2

4%

Social Sciences 2

4%

Business, Management and Accounting 2

4%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 3
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 177

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free