Perineal skin tear repair following vaginal birth; skin adhesive versus conventional suture–a randomised controlled trial

10Citations
Citations of this article
78Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This was a prospective randomised controlled trial comparing the effects of first-degree perineal tear repair using adhesive glue versus conventional suturing in terms of pain score, wound complication and patient’s satisfaction. One hundred and twenty one women were randomised. The skin adhesive group had a significantly lower pain score at rest as well as during sitting, walking and micturition during the first week of delivery compared to the suture group. The time taken to become pain free was significantly shorter in the tissue adhesive group (3.18 vs. 8.65 days, p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dasrilsyah, R. A., Kalok, A., Ng, B. K., Ali, A., Teik Chew, K., & Lim, P. S. (2021). Perineal skin tear repair following vaginal birth; skin adhesive versus conventional suture–a randomised controlled trial. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 41(2), 242–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2020.1740917

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free