Harmonic Scalpel Versus Clips for Ligation of Cystic Duct in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review

  • Pereira C
  • Gururaj S
  • Varghese B
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The gold standard treatment for benign gallbladder disease is laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). LC is commonly performed using monopolar diathermy with ligation of the cystic duct and artery with clips. The aim of the current systematic review was to compare harmonic scalpel (HS) with clips in LC. Eligible studies were identified from PubMed, Cochrane library, Embase and Medline and meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.4. The primary outcome evaluated was bile leak while secondary outcomes evaluated were overall postoperative complications, operative time, conversion to open surgery and gall bladder perforation. Eight randomized control trials met the eligibility criteria which included a total of 1,205 patients. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of bile leak (p = 0.56, I2=0%). With respect to the operative time (p = 0.004, I2=97%), conversion to open surgery (p = 0.02, I2=0%) and gall bladder perforation (p = 0.0001, I2=26%) HS was superior to clips. HS is an acceptable alternative to the use of clips when ligating the cystic duct.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pereira, C., Gururaj, S., & Varghese, B. (2022). Harmonic Scalpel Versus Clips for Ligation of Cystic Duct in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review. Cureus. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.32335

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free