Modeling Panel Data: Comparison of GLS Estimation and Robust Covariance Matrix Estimation

  • Muthama Musau V
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
62Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The proliferation of panel studies which has been greatly motivated by the availability of data and greater capacity for modeling the complexity of human behavior than a single cross-section or time series data has led to the rise of challenging methodologies for estimating the data sets. Much controversy on these methodologies is the under-estimation of the standard errors leading to wrong conclusions of the involved hypothesis test as well as making inappropriate inference to the underlying model parameters. This is due to the heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation nature of the disturbance term in the classical linear regression model. This study sought to estimate linear-panel model parameters using conventional regression techniques which have the capacity to address the correlation and heteroscedasticity problem. By relaxing the homogeneity and non-correlation properties of the disturbance term in the classical linear regression model, we employed the generalized least squares method to estimate the model parameters. Using the available White Heteroscedasticity Consistent estimators i.e. HC0, HC1, HC2, HC3 and HC4, we also obtained estimates for the generalized ordinary least squares covariance matrix.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Muthama Musau, V. (2015). Modeling Panel Data: Comparison of GLS Estimation and Robust Covariance Matrix Estimation. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 4(3), 185. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20150403.25

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free