Epidemiological characteristics of work-related ocular trauma among the carpenters in Medan, Indonesia

5Citations
Citations of this article
64Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Medan is the capital of North Sumatera Province and the most industrialised area of North Sumatera. One of the largest industries in Medan is the wooden industry. Ocular trauma is often happened in Medan and causes a serious problem. AIM: This study aimed to analyse the correlation between ocular trauma among the carpenters and the using of eye protection during work and educational level. METHODS: This study is conducted among the carpenters that work in the wooden industry. There were 30 carpenters that being observed about age, educational level and working hours and the using of eye protection during work that might be related to ocular trauma. All carpenters completed a comprehensive examination and interview. RESULTS: The most common age range of ocular trauma was between 26-45 years (56.7%), and all were male. Most of the traumatised carpenters educational level had a higher educational level (50%), and workers that had traumatised works more than 8 hours a day (66.7%). From this study, there was a significant correlation between ocular trauma among the carpenters and age (p = 0.047), and working hours (p = 0.039). CONCLUSION: No significant correlation between ocular trauma among the carpenters and the using of eye protection during work (p = 0.464), and educational level (0.925) was found. Furthermore to anticipate the high rate of worked-related ocular trauma required labour regulations that cover the age of recruitment workers and working hours a day. Work safety regulation protects the workers from work-related ocular trauma.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lubis, R. R., Limanto, V., Putri, R., Lubis, A. N., & Arrasyid, N. K. (2018). Epidemiological characteristics of work-related ocular trauma among the carpenters in Medan, Indonesia. Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences, 6(11), 2119–2122. https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2018.441

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free